8/29/05
Dear Mr. Parrott,
I’m not
entirely sure what to include in this evaluation/report. Let me say up-front that the experiences
COLAET/Rotary has provided me with are enough to write volumes. Nevertheless, I will try to pick out a few
fun anecdotes and other information that I think you would be interested in to
improve the program in future years.
To start
with the basics, I think the accommodations were more than adequate. I was lucky enough to have a large room with
a sink, desk, dresser and bed. My window
was oriented on the front of Furnival house, which gave me a view of the road
leading down Highgate Hill. The rooms of
other participants were much smaller, sometimes half the size of mine. Eric and Kim seemed at times to be living in
closets. As such, we spent a great deal
of free time in the kitchen. The kitchen
was almost always well-stocked and clean.
We had to buy food upon our arrival, but we had access to two stoves,
sinks, a dinner table, plenty of pantry space and four small refrigerators that
kept freezing our milk until we figured out how to adjust the settings. We cooked occasionally, but we almost always
met in the kitchen for some kind of meal…be it a spaghetti dinner or sandwiches
from the Tesco up the street. The
bathrooms were also clean and usually uncrowded.
We went to
a meet and greet with the director of the University of Westminster
summer program, Martin Doherty, at a pub a few days after arriving. Martin is a jovial guy
and was eager to meet the international students. I have to say that coming from ASU it was a
bit odd to have the director of a university program order drinks for us, but I
was certainly not going to complain.
After all, dinner and drinks in a pub is, without doubt, an authentic London experience.
My human
rights course at Westminster
was usually split into two halves. The
first half consisted of a lecture on the general history of a human rights
topic—minority rights, for example. I
was not entirely impressed with this portion of the exercise, as it consisted
mostly of a list of dates and conventions and had little in-depth
analysis. Nevertheless, this portion of
the class was more than counterbalanced by the amazing debates that we had
during the second half. The professor
would give us an absolutely brilliant topic that we would then have to debate
for more than an hour. I remember that
the topic of whether or not NGO’s such as the Red Cross should take a political
stance on controversial issues was particularly hot. Augmenting the topics themselves is the fact
that the class consisted of a quite diverse group of students. There was a middle-aged man from Nigeria,
several Muslim girls, an Italian, some rather opinionated British people and a
loud-mouthed American (I’ll let you guess who that was).
Adding to
the experience was the opportunity to take some memorable trips to other parts
of Europe.
Prague
was of particular interest to me due to its ancient history and the fact that
until 1989 it was a communist state.
Evidence of its communist past was quite visible in many parts of the
city. At intersections and public
buildings it was not uncommon to find statues of burly industrial men and women
holding large hammers and striking patriotic poses. I’ve seen this sort of state-sponsored
artwork in movies before, but I’ve always attributed it to a communist
stereotype promoted by Hollywood. It was strange to see it first-hand. The central part of Prague—the
Old Town Square
and Castle Hill seemed like a page taken right out of medieval Europe. The
ancient clock tower and dozens of churches with soaring spires are images that
I will always remember. While taking a
guided tour is never a bad idea in a completely foreign city, I definitely
think the best way to experience most European towns is to snack at as many
cafés as possible and spend time observing the tourists and the locals. The Charles Bridge
is a cultural site unto itself.
While our
excursions were nothing short of spectacular, one thing that would have been
helpful is the opportunity to mingle with other scholarship recipients prior to
leaving for London. The Lake Havasu Luncheon was a great way to
meet parents, COLAET/Rotary officers and get some answers to important
questions. Nevertheless, it would have
also been nice to spend some time with the other scholars outside of a formal
setting. One of the biggest barriers I
found to planning trips ahead of time was the fact that I did not know what the
other scholars were planning to see, or even if I would want to travel with them. While we grew to be very close once we were
in London, it
would have been nice to start building those relationships ahead of time. This would have made it somewhat easier and
cheaper to plan group trips out of the country.
To sum up,
I’d like to mention some more personal benefits that this experience provided
me. Before leaving for London I spent a month living in an
Ecuadorian Quichua community. My time
with this indigenous people was itself a truly memorable and life-altering
experience. It gave me an opportunity to
break out of the Western mindset and observe my own European roots with fresh
eyes. I was almost certain that a sudden
change in environment, such as the one I experienced when I went to London, would expose me
to some degree of culture shock.
Nevertheless, this sort of self-induced cognitive dissonance was a goal
that I failed to achieve. What I learned
instead was that I feel comfortable drinking corn chicha and dancing in an Indi
Raymi festival in Picalqui, and only two weeks later, sharing a pint of
Strongbow in an authentic English pub. I
am at ease living in a traditional Quichua hut and taking a leisurely tour of Buckingham Palace.
And perhaps more important than anything, I realized that even on
opposite sides of the globe, children laugh in the same way, and often, at the
same things.
If I
haven’t already said it enough, thank you for this truly spectacular
experience. I will draw on these lessons
for the rest of my life.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Confer
PS. If you’d like to
know anything more specific, please let me know.